Narmada Samachar: 24 October 2001
- Maheshwar Dam: Diversion of funds by S.Kumars
- Sardar Sarovar Dam: One year since the Supreme Court judgment
- Other NBA press releases
- Feature Article: A victory for the NBA - Anupama Katakam
All this (and more) news can be accessed via the Press Clippings
The NBA press releases are accessible at:
Archives of Narmada Samachar are accessible at:
Maheshwar Dam: Diversion of funds by S.Kumars
Press ReleasesNBA calls on RBI to freeze account of S.Kumars company Induj Enertech Ltd.
and institute enquiry, asks SEBI to disallow proposed IPO or ensure disclosure ;
S.Kumars divert over Rs. 100 crores of public funds earmarked for
Maheshwar Hydro Project to its other companies, defaults on other
public loans and payments; NBA calls upon FI's not to finance another Enron,
ask for judicial enquiry ;
Press ClippingsNBA alleges diversion of funds ;
Sardar Sarovar Dam: One year since the Supreme Court judgment
Press ReleasesRallies In Narmada Valley and Outside On "Black Day" 18th Oct.
Assumptions in verdict belied: No resettlement upto 90 m.
Call to review Court decision: Protect people's rights ;
News ClippingsNBA protests seeking review of SC verdict ;
Why They Call It a Black Day ;
... In the majority judgment that decided the case, Justice B N Kirpal observed: The Government ... did not accept the [Morse] Report and commented adversely on it. In view of the above, we do not propose, while considering the petitioners' contentions, to place any reliance on the report of the Morse Committee. But the Government of India was itself the first respondent in the case! This positively baffles my non-lawyerly mind. How can a respondent's view of evidence that is critical of that respondent be allowed to decide whether a court considers such evidence at all? After all, if you are a murderer facing trial, and the prosecution produces a murder weapon as evidence, would it be OK for you to tell the court: 'I don't like that gun. Please do not consider it as evidence.' Would it be OK for the court to pay heed to you and throw the gun out without examining it? I read the judgment very carefully, looking for a sign that the court had rejected the Morse Report for more tangible reasons. I found none. The government's mere dislike of the report appeared to have been good enough. And yet, elsewhere in the judgment, Justice Kirpal quotes approvingly from another report -- one he doesn't name -- by the World Bank. He says: The cost and benefit of the project were examined by the World Bank in 1990 and the following passage speaks for itself: "The argument in favour of the Sardar Sarovar Project is that the benefits are so large that they substantially outweigh the costs of the immediate human and environmental disruption. ... [etc]." ...
It was the final day of the Narmada Bachao Andolan's monsoon Satyagraha. There was a festive gathering, in village Domkhedi, on the banks of what was once a river. About two thousand people sat listening to a 14-year-old boy who had gone to meet the President in New Delhi. ... The day after the children's visit to Rashtrapati Bhavan the President sent a message saying that he had got the appeal and thanked the children for coming from so far away. On September 6, the last day of the Satyagraha, Magan conveyed a hopeful message to his elders. The President promised that their journey wouldn't be wasted. ``He will do something to help us,'' Magan said as he stood in front of a grand tree which has a red line painted across its trunk. That red line is where water would reach if the Sardar Sarovar Dam were filled to its current 90-metre height. If there had been a heavy monsoon this year, that Satyagraha site would have gone under water. The dense crop of grain, standing tall all over Domkhedi, would also have gone waste. ... Implementation of the Daud Committee report has been one of the main demands of this year's Satyagraha and the recent action in Mumbai. The dharna in Mumbai was finally lifted only after the State Government gave assurances about rapid action on several of the Andolan's demands. These assurances relate only to project-affected villages in Maharashtra. There is a much larger area facing submergence in Madhya Pradesh and that battle has to be fought with the State government in Bhopal. Yet the gains of the Mumbai action will have a wider impact. The most important gain is that the Ministers of the Maharashtra government have acknowledged errors in earlier reports they submitted to the Supreme Court on progress in rehabilitation work. It has now been officially accepted that there are thousands of families who have already been displaced without adequate rehabilitation. It follows then that there can be no further construction of the SSP, until there is dramatic improvement in the status of rehabilitation work. However, these gains are offset by the fact that the Madhya Pradesh government is going ahead with work on several other dams, on the Narmada, even after acknowledging that there is not enough land available for full rehabilitation of the displaced families. That is why those children from the Valley went to meet the President of India, who is specially empowered to protect the rights of Adivasis and Scheduled Castes. To a pessimist, the President's promise to those children may look like a straw in the wind. But for those who lend their energy to Satyagraha in the Valley, it is one more reason for hope and perseverance.
Other NBA press releases
Veteran social activist Dashrath Tatya Patil passes away in Dhule;
Narmada and people's movements in Maharashtra lose their comrade ;
Feature Article: A victory for the NBA - Anupama Katakam
Frontline, Oct 13 - 26, 2001 -
IN what is seen as a positive development in the matter of resettlement of people affected by the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) in Maharashtra, the State government has put together a plan that not only involves the participation of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) but also promises the formulation of the long-awaited master plan for rehabilitation and resettlement. The NBA's leader Medha Patkar and six activists ended their 10-day-old hunger strike on the issue on September 27, after the government conceded most of their demands. The NBA, which has been spearheading the agitation of the people evacuated by the dam, seeks the implementation of the recommendations of the Justice S.M. Daud Committee as well as a review of the controversial land rights and resettlement issues. Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh assured Medha Patkar that a complete verification of the Project-Affected People (PAP) would be done before any further decision on the dam height was taken. Furthermore, he said the Daud Committee report, which was submitted over two months earlier, would be discussed at the next Cabinet meeting. Medha Patkar, who came close to being administered intravenous fluids, welcomed the breakthrough. "This is a major step forward," she said. "But breaking this fast does not mean the end of an ordeal. The real painstaking fight lies ahead when we try to get these promises implemented." The NBA had demanded that the process of verification of the Project-Affected Families should be done through village-wise surveys at heights of 90 metres, 93 metres, 100 metres and the full dam height. The government said it would consult the Narmada Control Authority on a re-survey and ensure that the survey and the verification were done within two months. For this it will appoint a task force as demanded by the NBA. Representatives of the NBA and the Punarwarsan Sangharsh Samiti (PSS) will be part of the task force, which will be headed by the Divisional Commissioner of Nashik. In addition, a letter from Principal Secretary (Rehabilitation) R.K Bhargava to the NBA states that a new planning group, which will include NBA members, will be formed to draft a comprehensive master plan for rehabilitation. Surveys would be done to take stock of the resettlement work and detect lacunae, if any. A Secretary-level overview committee would supervise the implementation of the whole programme, the letter said. The government also told the NBA that it would not stand in the way of providing land rights to 33 affected tribal villages in Akrani tehsil of Nandurbar district - an important demand of the NBA. Until recently the government had used a High Court case pertaining to the conversion of forest settlements to legitimate revenue villages to deny land rights to the affected tribal people and other villagers. The Bombay High Court is expected to hear the matter on October 10. The NBA argues that these so-called forest villages were formed before the promulgation of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and a proposal to designate them as revenue villages was ready by 1986-87. However, the government delayed the notification and finally issued it only in 1992. "This process cannot be cancelled arbitrarily, as the government did in 1994 by cursorily cancelling the notification of 1992," an NBA statement said. The dharna by NBA activists and the hunger strike by Medha Patkar were part of the Andolan's protracted struggle against the governments of the three States "benefiting" from the SSP. "The Maharashtra government may have conceded the NBA's demands, but it remains to be seen whether it is just a tactic to pacify me and get me to end the hunger strike," Medha Patkar told Frontline. She believes that without the "political will, issues relating to the SSP will never be resolved". The government, she said, appeared to be making some effort, but a number of problems remained. For instance, she wondered whether there was enough land to be given as compensation. Madhya Pradesh was willing to provide monetary reparation, but that was not the solution in the case of people who had lost acres of cultivable land, she argued. "Piecemeal solutions will not do," said Medha Patkar. She wanted a master plan that looked at the larger issues. The Maharashtra government has agreed to formulate this plan but NBA activists are sceptical about it reaching fruition. After all, in its judgment permitting the project authorities to go ahead with the construction of the dam, the Supreme Court stipulated that a master plan for rehabilitation and resettlement be presented to it within 40 days of the ruling. The deadline expired last year and there has been no mention of it since. This, the NBA said, had led it to understand that the governments had no intention of looking at the larger picture. A government official told Frontline that one of the biggest difficulties the Maharashtra government faced was in compensating for the lost of land with land: "We are in the process of purchasing land but there is not enough land available for distribution when the dam reaches its full height." There does not seem to be enough land even for those who were affected by the dam when its height reached 90 metres. According to the NBA's figures, of the 144 families displaced at the 90-metre height, only 69 have been resettled. Should the dam height be increased, as many as 1,061 families in Maharashtra could be displaced. NBA activist Clifton Rozario said the government cleared 2,700 hectares of forest land in 1990 to resettle those who had been displaced. Subsequently, it cleared another 1,500 hectares. Of the 4,200 hectares, 795 hectares was not cultivable. Rozario claimed that in Maharashtra approximately 20,000 hectares would be affected by the dam. "How can 4,200 hectares replace 20,000 hectares?" he asked. He pointed out that those who were resettled in 1994 had not yet been given land titles. "It means that tomorrow the land can be snatched away from them without any explanation," he said. "The Chief Minister has promised us that the land titles will be given within the next three months," he added. WHAT is resettlement and when is a family resettled? According to the World Bank's guidelines, the purpose of resettlement is to help a family regain its previous standard of living. By that yardstick, the resettlement and rehabilitation plans of the governments of Maharashtra and the other State governments concerned were failures, said Rozario. In Maharashtra, none of the five resettlement sites in Taloda met the standard requirement, he said. In fact, the Committee to Assist the Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Sardar Sarovar Project-Affected People, headed by Justice S.M. Daud, exposed the Maharashtra government's failed resettlement and rehabilitation efforts. Its report brings out the inherent inadequacies in the resettlement process. These include the non-availability of land, incorrect enumeration of the project-affected Adivasis, non-granting of land rights, unequal resettlement policy and bureaucratic corruption. It places the blame for most of these on the absence of a master plan for rehabilitation. A physical verification of the project area, it states, shows that the resettlement of those displaced at a dam height of 90 metres is yet to be completed. It is against increasing the height of the dam before families that have already been displaced are resettled. Additionally, owing to the non-availability of land, hundreds of displaced tribal people have no source of income, the report says. Members of the Committee, who visited resettlement villages, say the sites "lack almost all the basic facilities required for habitation. One of the greatest shortcomings is the non-availability of water even for cooking and drinking." The Committee was formed after people from the 33 affected villages protested for three days in Mumbai in January demanding an independent review, within the framework of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award (NWDTA), of the plight of those who had been relocated and those who were in the submergence zone. In fact, Deshmukh announced the formation of two independent committees, to review the rehabilitation status of the persons displaced in Maharashtra and to do a cost-benefit analysis of the SSP for Maharashtra. While the Daud Committee reviewed the status of the affected people and submitted its report on July 3, 2001, the second committee remained only on paper. Now the State government has said it will constitute a study group to do a cost-benefit analysis of the project. The report is expected in six months. FOREMOST among the Daud Committee's recommendations is the one to alter the definition of "project-affected persons" by including all those affected by every type of construction related to the dam. In addition, the committee suggests that the government undertake a fresh survey to determine the number of families that would be affected and the compensatory acreage as part of the process of granting land rights, using the unpublished official surveys of 1985-86. The Committee, having surveyed much of the area, recommended that for the loss of agricultural income the tribal people should receive monetary compensation, in addition to land, for a period of at least 50 years. For those who have been deprived of their houses and agricultural land because of submergence but have not been placed in possession of cultivable land and house plots, it suggests a compensation of Rs.3,000 an acre a year from the date of ouster to the date on which they are placed in undisturbed legal possession of new land. "What we prescribe is far less than what the tribals are entitled to. Their loss is irreparable," the report says. Much of the report's contents are common knowledge. Now it has been officially documented. Unfortunately, when the report was presented to the government, it was labelled "anti-dam and pro-NBA". Perhaps that explains the government's indifference to discussing it and, of course, its implementing the recommendations. One of the critical requirements of the NWDTA is that the rights of the displaced Adivasis are ensured before work on the dam begins. It states that any individual or community facing submergence owing to proposed construction should be rehabilitated one year before actual submergence. This norm has been consistently violated, says Rozario. Once the reviews and surveys are complete and are presented to the Narmada Control Authority, if the government does not provide adequate resettlement before increasing the height of the dam, that will be in complete violation of the law, he says. Given the history of the struggle, the NBA wants to make sure every project-affected person is accounted for.